The Science of Why We Grind

60 years of published research.

Six decades of peer-reviewed science behind why mechanically processed forage and biomass outperforms unprocessed material. This isn’t marketing. It’s published data from universities and research institutions worldwide, with the links so you can read it yourself.

+0.54 kg

Daily milk per cow with optimized forage particle size

Bal et al. · 46-study meta-analysis
49%

Better winter feed efficiency on chopped straw bedding

NDSU Carrington
$93

Winter bedding savings, processed vs. long straw

South Dakota State University
10–84%

Methane yield improvement with reduced particle size

DBFZ Germany · Aarhus University

Particle size affects milk production, feed efficiency, animal health, bedding quality, and biogas yield. The research has been building for decades, but it mostly lives in journals nobody outside a university reads. We pulled it into the open. Here is what the studies actually say, organized by what it means for your operation.

Milk Production

Smaller, consistent particles make more milk.

A meta-analysis in the Journal of Dairy Science pooled 46 studies going back to 1998. The consistent finding: as forage particle size decreased, milk production went up, about half a kilogram per cow per day. That is not one study. It is forty-six pointing the same direction.

It compounds across the herd and the lactation. A pound of milk per cow per day is real money once you multiply it out.

+0.54 kg
Daily milk increase per cow with optimized forage particle size.
Bal et al. (2015), J. Dairy Science · 46 studies
Feed Sorting & Efficiency

When cows sort, you lose milk you never see.

Research out of Canada found that every 2% increase in cows sorting against the long particles in a TMR is associated with a 0.9 kg/day drop in fat-corrected milk, nearly two pounds, per cow, per day. If the ration drifts long, cows pick out the grain and leave the fiber, and you are losing production without tracking it.

The fix is consistency: a particle size uniform enough that there is nothing to sort against. A 500-cow dairy that got serious about TMR consistency documented $50,000–$60,000 a year in savings (Penn State).

0.9 kg
Fat-corrected milk lost per cow per day for every 2% rise in sorting.
DeVries & Beauchemin, J. Dairy Science
Transition Cows

Short-chopped straw keeps fresh cows eating.

University of Guelph studied straw chop length in dry-cow transition diets, short chop (about 2 cm) versus long (about 8 cm). The cows on the shorter chop ate more, sorted less, and had lower ketosis markers coming into fresh.

Dry cows are the hardest group to keep eating, they are bored and will pick through a ration all day. Chopping the straw fixes it: intake holds, body condition holds, and they transition cleaner.

↑ Intake
Higher dry-matter intake, less sorting, and lower ketosis markers on short-chopped straw.
Schoenberg et al. (2020) · University of Guelph
Bedding & Udder Health

How the straw is processed drives your milk check.

NDSU’s Carrington station found cattle on chopped straw bedding had 49% better feed efficiency over winter than cattle on long straw, with real measurable savings. Chopped bedding insulates better and stays drier, so animals spend less energy staying warm and put it into gain instead.

On the dairy side, bedding particle size drives moisture retention, which drives bacterial growth, which drives somatic cell count. One study found Strep. uberis survived 35 days on straw but only 7 on sawdust, management and material matter.

$93
Winter bedding savings · 49% better feed efficiency.
NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center
Hay Waste

Open feeders throw away up to a fifth of every bale.

Oklahoma State extension puts hay waste at open-bottom feeders at up to 21% of bale weight. A 2021 Missouri/Sexten study showed waste dropping from 20% with a typical ring feeder to 6% with a better design. On a 1,500 lb round bale, 20% waste is 300 lb on the ground.

Run it through a HayBuster and into the bunk, and cattle cannot kick it, trample it, or bed on it. The waste number heads toward zero.

21%
Of bale weight wasted at open-bottom feeders, 300 lb on a 1,500 lb bale.
Oklahoma State Extension · Sexten et al. (2021)
Biogas & Biomass

Shorter particles, faster methane.

Reducing feedstock particle size improves anaerobic-digestion methane yield by 10–84% depending on the material (DBFZ Germany, Aarhus University). Smaller particles mean more surface area for the bacteria, fewer floating layers, and less wear on pumps and agitators.

The catch is processing the wet, stringy material at all. HayBuster’s Anvil screens cut against a solid edge instead of through holes that plug, so manure-with-straw and old bales feed cleanly into the reactor.

10–84%
Methane yield improvement with reduced particle size.
DBFZ Germany · Aarhus University, Denmark
Beef cattle eating a fine consistent chop at the feed bunk
Cows eat more of a chop they cannot sort
Dairy cattle feeding at the bunk
At the bunk, particle size decides intake
Consistent total mixed ration
A consistent TMR holds the ration together
Research Library

The studies, in full.

Every figure above traces back to published, peer-reviewed work. Read it yourself.

Journal of Dairy Science

Bal et al. (2015), Forage Particle Size & Dairy Performance

46-study meta-analysis linking finer forage to higher milk production.

doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8726 ↗
Journal of Dairy Science

DeVries & Beauchemin (2017), Feed Sorting: Causes & Consequences

Quantifies the milk lost when cows sort against long TMR particles.

journalofdairyscience.org ↗
University of Guelph

Schoenberg et al. (2020), Straw Chop Length in Transition Cow Diets

Short-chopped straw improves intake and lowers ketosis markers in fresh cows.

sciencedirect.com ↗
Penn State Extension

What Is Your Feed Refusal Costing You? (2024)

TMR consistency savings documented at a 500-cow dairy.

extension.psu.edu ↗
Penn State Extension

The Penn State Particle Separator

The standard tool for measuring TMR particle size, the 19/8/4 mm box.

extension.psu.edu ↗
Oklahoma State Extension

Hay Feeder Design Effect on Hay Waste

Open-bottom feeders waste up to 21% of bale weight.

extension.okstate.edu ↗
Translational Animal Science

Sexten et al. (2021), Bale Feeder Design, Waste & Intake

Hay waste from 20% to 6% by feeder design and processing.

academic.oup.com ↗
PubMed

Survival of Streptococcus uberis on Bedding Substrates

Bedding material and management drive pathogen survival and SCC.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
DAIReXNET

Forage & TMR Particle Size and Rumen Fermentation

How particle size affects rumen health and fermentation in dairy cattle.

dairy-cattle.extension.org ↗
NCBI Bookshelf

Dry Matter Intake, Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle

The reference text on intake, including chopped-straw effects.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
Farm Show Magazine

Custom Grinding with the HayBuster H-1000

A custom operator’s real-world economics, 95% repeat customers.

farmshow.com ↗
NDSU Carrington · SDSU

Bedding & Feed-Efficiency Field Trials

49% feed-efficiency gain and $93/head winter savings on processed bedding.

Summary on haybuster.com ↗

Have data from your own operation, feed efficiency, milk, bedding cost, biogas yield? We’d genuinely like to see it. Email leads@chtrade.com. The numbers from real yards matter more than any single journal article.

Put the Science to Work

The research points one direction. So does the machine.

Find the right HayBuster for your operation, or talk it through with us.

Which HayBuster? Get a Quote
Strohmühle · Molino · Broyeur · Измельчитель · Tub Grinder
Whatever your country calls it, it grinds hay. Since 1966.